Remo Duplicate Photos Remover vs Cleaner – Clean Phone: what 6,228 reviews say

Remo Duplicate Photos Remover vs Cleaner – Clean Phone: the numbers side by side

Where do Remo Duplicate Photos Remover and Cleaner – Clean Phone differ most?

• Cleaner – Clean Phone's unhappy reviewers mention ads, pop-ups and pushy screens about 10 times as often as Remo Duplicate Photos Remover's: 26.1% against 2.6% of 1–2★ reviews.
• On the app not working or doing little, Remo Duplicate Photos Remover draws 33.5% of its 1–2★ reviews, while Cleaner – Clean Phone draws 19.4%.
• Slowness, crashes and bugs is a bigger issue for Remo Duplicate Photos Remover (20% of low ratings) than for Cleaner – Clean Phone (8%).
• Cleaner – Clean Phone's unhappy reviewers mention billing, trials and cancelling about 8 times as often as Remo Duplicate Photos Remover's: 9.2% against 1.1% of 1–2★ reviews.
• Remo Duplicate Photos Remover's unhappy reviewers mention missed duplicates or poor matches about 22 times as often as Cleaner – Clean Phone's: 6.7% against 0.3% of 1–2★ reviews.

Both are compared on Android, where both have enough reviews. Remo Duplicate Photos Remover scans the gallery for exact and similar duplicate photos and deletes the extra copies; Cleaner – Clean Phone analyses storage, recommends files to delete and works as a file manager.

Are Remo Duplicate Photos Remover and Cleaner – Clean Phone improving?

Remo Duplicate Photos Remover went from 3.63 stars in 2025-Q3 to 3.95 in 2026-Q3, with billing at 0% of its latest 1–2★ reviews. Cleaner – Clean Phone went from 4.35 stars in 2025-Q3 to 4.39 in 2026-Q3, with billing at 20% of its latest 1–2★ reviews. On Google Play, Cleaner – Clean Phone's developer answers more unhappy reviewers (100% against 59.4%).

Where are Remo Duplicate Photos Remover and Cleaner – Clean Phone alike?

Their reviewers agree on having to review items one by one: on each, the two apps are within two points of each other (2.2% vs 2.9%). 23% of Remo Duplicate Photos Remover's reviews are 1★ and 58.4% are 5★; for Cleaner – Clean Phone the split is 9.3% and 80.8%, so Remo Duplicate Photos Remover has noticeably more very angry reviewers.

What do happy users praise in each?

24.9% of Remo Duplicate Photos Remover's 4–5★ reviews say it finds duplicates and similar shots, compared with 0.3% for Cleaner – Clean Phone. 20.9% of Remo Duplicate Photos Remover's 4–5★ reviews say it is easy to use, compared with 10.5% for Cleaner – Clean Phone. 31.9% of Remo Duplicate Photos Remover's 4–5★ reviews say it works, compared with 26.5% for Cleaner – Clean Phone.

Which is cheaper, Remo Duplicate Photos Remover or Cleaner – Clean Phone?

Remo Duplicate Photos Remover: no in-app purchases listed on the US App Store; Google Play (US) $4.99 to $59.99 per item. Cleaner – Clean Phone: Google Play (US) $0.99 to $99.99 per item, with ads. Cleaner – Clean Phone starts lower, at $0.99 against $4.99. Billing makes up 1.1% of Remo Duplicate Photos Remover's 1–2★ reviews and 9.2% of Cleaner – Clean Phone's.

What reviewers say about Remo Duplicate Photos Remover and Cleaner – Clean Phone

• Remo Duplicate Photos Remover: "It works very well and there are no ads here." (5★, Google Play, US, May 2026)
• Remo Duplicate Photos Remover: "freezes on initial loading and goes no further total waste of time" (1★, Google Play, US, Mar 2024)
• Cleaner – Clean Phone: "Far too many ads. Every touch or click brings another ad...many more than most free cleaners. Uninstall." (3★, Google Play, US, Nov 2021)
• Cleaner – Clean Phone: "Worst ever experience. Keeps on asking permissions even though I've permitted. Ads!" (1★, Google Play, US, Apr 2024)

Picked from the ads, pop-ups and pushy screens and the app not working or doing little themes, where the two differ most.

Should you choose Remo Duplicate Photos Remover or Cleaner – Clean Phone?

On ratings alone, Cleaner – Clean Phone is the safer bet on the evidence here, with 15.9% fewer 1–2★ reviews. If ads, pop-ups and pushy screens is what worries you most, Remo Duplicate Photos Remover has the better record on it.